Social Influences on Politics

The public image of female politicians is an example of Bordo’s idea of docile bodies. The women are subjected and transformed by the expectations of the public. Since men have had the most history in politics, the general public is used to the way they act and expects the female politicians to follow their example. Instead of portraying the caring and understanding qualities that people expect in the typical woman, female politicians have to be strong and driven with a “take no prisoners” attitude because those are the qualities that male politicians display. Even the way female politicians dress is influenced by their male counterparts. Hillary Clinton, seen as a smart and sophisticated leader, typically wears pant suits, compared to Michelle Bachmann or Sarah Palin, who are seen as incompetent and poor leaders, who typically wear dresses or skirts. Since Clinton’s pant suits more closely resemble the typical attire worn by the male politicians, she is held in much higher esteem. The way Hillary Clinton dresses is obviously not the only thing that has gained her the reputation she has, but I do believe it was easier for her to be taken seriously by the public because her choice in clothing.

Politics give a good example of docile bodies, but an even better example of Howard Becker’s ideas. Many people use their political beliefs to identify with others. While there are people on all ends of the spectrum, it seems to me that when groups of like-minded people are together, at political conventions for example, each individual’s beliefs are stronger. When alone, someone could be unsure if they supported gay marriage, but when surrounded by liberal individuals at a democratic convention, they may be nudged into becoming an outspoken supporter. This is similar to the idea that Howard Becker introduced in his article about becoming a pot smoker. When in the right social situations, the experience and ideas of the individual can be changed.